DELHI’S CHILLING INDIFFERENCE
Every winter, hundreds of homeless
poor people die of cold in Delhi. This year,
a conservative estimate of the number of dead hangs around 100. The
inaction and lackadaisical attitude portrayed by the government towards these
lives is inhumane. It definitely does not reflect the manner in which a
socialist and egalitarian society thrives and so the uncertainty looming large over
the fates of these homeless people must be exterminated through an action plan.
And
for that it becomes vital to know the extant mechanism which the Delhi
government has in place to deal with this evil in a quest to make winters as
enjoyable to the destitute as it is to the rich. The adequacy and
implementation of the existing laws is another concern.
As per
a newspaper report in 2010, Delhi had
40 night shelters back then, of which 25 were run by the Muncipal Corporation of Delhi (MCD) and the remaining
temporary structures were run by the Delhi government. These structures could
accommodate around 1,50,000 homeless people. Only two of these 40 night
shelters were meant for women and children. And because they were not properly
maintained, even the available capacity was far from being fully utilized.
Till
2010, MCD used to have a “Slum Dweller and JJ Department” which was overtaken by the
Delhi government through passing of the Delhi Urban Shelter Improvement Board (DUSIB) Act, 2010. The objective of this Act
was to form a DUSIB board which would provide shelter to the people living in
slums and JJ colonies. The name must have rung a bell in your mind. Yes, the
night shelter scam of Rs. 20 Crore about which we heard in January this year
was perpetrated by the Babus working
in the DUSIB constituted under this very Act. The scam had been unfolding over
two decades and finally was discovered in January this year. The long overdue
CBI inquiry is now underway and let us hope that the guilty get punished. So,
the problem here is not of inadequacy of law but of implementation.
Delhi's poor fight the dipping mercury |
Possible remedies by the enforcement of existing law or through PIL
In 1990 while deciding Shantisar Builders v. Narayan Khimlal
Totale, [AIR 1990 SC 630] it was laid down by the sentinel of our
fundamental rights, the Supreme Court of India that the right to decent
environment and reasonable accommodation to live in is a subset of our bigger
right, i.e., right to life. The Court went on to observe that the difference
between a human being and an animal is, that for the latter, mere protection of
its bare body serves wells but the former needs much more (suitable
accommodation allowing to him to grow physically, mentally and intellectually).
But what we see in practice is glaring indifference! Delhi government has not
even afforded protection to the bare bodies of its people from the wrath of the
weather.
Again
in 1995, the apex court, in State
of Karnataka v.
Narasimhamurthy [1995 (5) SCC 524] held
that right to shelter constitutes a fundamental right under Article 19(1)(e) of the
Constitution (which provides that all citizens shall have the right to reside
and settle in any part of the territory of India) in the manner that the State
has to provide facilities and opportunity to build houses for poor, who
otherwise will be unable to exercise their right under article 19(1)(e). Moreover,
land acquired by the state for the purpose of housing the underprivileged was
interpreted as a public purpose under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The court
went to the extent of saying that it is a constitutional duty of the State to
provide house sites to the poor.
There is a legion of other
Supreme Court and High Court judgments recognizing the right to shelter of all
citizens which hold that the right finds its genesis in the conjoint reading of
article 19(1)(e) and Article 21 of the Indian Constitution.
Moreover on 9th Jan,
2012, acting upon a PIL filed by Peoples’ Union for Civil Liberties, Supreme
Court issued a directive to the Delhi Government thereby asking it to ensure
that no deaths were caused because of
cold.
To conclude, the problem can be
remedied by concerted executive act under the DUSIB Act, 2010 or by petitioning
Supreme Court by vigilant citizenry or NGOs like PUCL. But something must be
done because our inaction is costing us human lives….
No comments:
Post a Comment